Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to San Bruno
This post compares Napa, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Napa (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,722 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $51,449 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $754,700 |
| White | 76% | 49% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 3% | 28% |
| With Kids | 34% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 39 |
| Rentals | 43% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or San Bruno?
A: Napa has a larger population count than San Bruno: 79722 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Napa versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z