Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Napa, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Napa (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,722 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $51,449 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $444,200 |
| White | 76% | 62% |
| Black | 0% | 9% |
| Asian | 3% | 13% |
| With Kids | 34% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 35 |
| Rentals | 43% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Napa has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 79722 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Napa does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Napa versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z