Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to Pleasant Hill
This post compares Napa, California to Pleasant Hill, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Napa (city) | Pleasant Hill (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,722 | 34,662 |
| Income (median) | $51,449 | $77,000 |
| Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $633,400 |
| White | 76% | 75% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 3% | 13% |
| With Kids | 34% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 39 |
| Rentals | 43% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or Pleasant Hill?
A: Napa has a larger population count than Pleasant Hill: 79722 compared with 34662 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in Pleasant Hill?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or Pleasant Hill?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Napa does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Napa versus 39% for Pleasant Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z