Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to Placentia
This post compares Napa, California to Placentia, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Napa (city) | Placentia (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,722 | 52,294 |
| Income (median) | $51,449 | $53,201 |
| Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $585,800 |
| White | 76% | 72% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 3% | 17% |
| With Kids | 34% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 37 |
| Rentals | 43% | 35% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or Placentia?
A: Napa has a larger population count than Placentia: 79722 compared with 52294 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in Placentia?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or Placentia?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Napa does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Napa versus 35% for Placentia.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z