Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to Pico Rivera
This post compares Napa, California to Pico Rivera, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Napa (city) | Pico Rivera (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 79,722 | 63,750 |
Income (median) | $51,449 | $36,529 |
Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $380,200 |
White | 76% | 55% |
Black | 0% | 0% |
Asian | 3% | 3% |
With Kids | 34% | 42% |
Age (median) | 38 | 36 |
Rentals | 43% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or Pico Rivera?
A: Napa has a larger population count than Pico Rivera: 79722 compared with 63750 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in Pico Rivera?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or Pico Rivera?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Napa does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Napa versus 33% for Pico Rivera.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z