Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to Pasadena
This post compares Napa, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Napa (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,722 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $51,449 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $689,700 |
| White | 76% | 53% |
| Black | 0% | 10% |
| Asian | 3% | 16% |
| With Kids | 34% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 37 |
| Rentals | 43% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or Pasadena?
A: Napa has a smaller population count than Pasadena: 79722 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Napa versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z