Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to Palm Springs
This post compares Napa, California to Palm Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Napa (city) | Palm Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,722 | 47,140 |
| Income (median) | $51,449 | $45,934 |
| Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $340,600 |
| White | 76% | 83% |
| Black | 0% | 4% |
| Asian | 3% | 4% |
| With Kids | 34% | 12% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 54 |
| Rentals | 43% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or Palm Springs?
A: Napa has a larger population count than Palm Springs: 79722 compared with 47140 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in Palm Springs?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or Palm Springs?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Napa does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Napa versus 41% for Palm Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z