Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to Pacifica
This post compares Napa, California to Pacifica, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Napa (city) | Pacifica (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,722 | 39,141 |
| Income (median) | $51,449 | $68,966 |
| Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $740,700 |
| White | 76% | 63% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 3% | 19% |
| With Kids | 34% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 42 |
| Rentals | 43% | 31% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or Pacifica?
A: Napa has a larger population count than Pacifica: 79722 compared with 39141 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in Pacifica?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or Pacifica?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Napa does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Napa versus 31% for Pacifica.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z