Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to Lincoln
This post compares Napa, California to Lincoln, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Napa (city) | Lincoln (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,722 | 46,404 |
| Income (median) | $51,449 | $59,287 |
| Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $389,900 |
| White | 76% | 81% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 3% | 6% |
| With Kids | 34% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 43 |
| Rentals | 43% | 21% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or Lincoln?
A: Napa has a larger population count than Lincoln: 79722 compared with 46404 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in Lincoln?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or Lincoln?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Napa does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Napa versus 21% for Lincoln.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z