Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to Lawndale
This post compares Napa, California to Lawndale, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Napa (city) | Lawndale (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,722 | 33,191 |
| Income (median) | $51,449 | $37,317 |
| Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $417,600 |
| White | 76% | 42% |
| Black | 0% | 10% |
| Asian | 3% | 10% |
| With Kids | 34% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 35 |
| Rentals | 43% | 67% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or Lawndale?
A: Napa has a larger population count than Lawndale: 79722 compared with 33191 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in Lawndale?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or Lawndale?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lawndale does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Napa versus 67% for Lawndale.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z