Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to Irvine
This post compares Napa, California to Irvine, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Napa (city) | Irvine (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,722 | 256,877 |
| Income (median) | $51,449 | $81,453 |
| Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $753,400 |
| White | 76% | 47% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 3% | 41% |
| With Kids | 34% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 34 |
| Rentals | 43% | 51% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or Irvine?
A: Napa has a much smaller population count than Irvine: 79722 compared with 256877 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in Irvine?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or Irvine?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Irvine does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Napa versus 51% for Irvine.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z