Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to Imperial Beach
This post compares Napa, California to Imperial Beach, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Napa (city) | Imperial Beach (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,722 | 27,270 |
| Income (median) | $51,449 | $39,262 |
| Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $433,400 |
| White | 76% | 71% |
| Black | 0% | 4% |
| Asian | 3% | 8% |
| With Kids | 34% | 37% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 31 |
| Rentals | 43% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or Imperial Beach?
A: Napa has a larger population count than Imperial Beach: 79722 compared with 27270 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in Imperial Beach?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or Imperial Beach?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Imperial Beach does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Napa versus 68% for Imperial Beach.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z