Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to Foothill Farms
This post compares Napa, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Napa (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,722 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $51,449 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $201,200 |
| White | 76% | 67% |
| Black | 0% | 9% |
| Asian | 3% | 5% |
| With Kids | 34% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 33 |
| Rentals | 43% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or Foothill Farms?
A: Napa has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 79722 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Napa versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z