Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to Eureka
This post compares Napa, California to Eureka, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Napa (city) | Eureka (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,722 | 27,024 |
| Income (median) | $51,449 | $33,280 |
| Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $249,300 |
| White | 76% | 75% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 3% | 7% |
| With Kids | 34% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 37 |
| Rentals | 43% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or Eureka?
A: Napa has a larger population count than Eureka: 79722 compared with 27024 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in Eureka?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or Eureka?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Napa versus 54% for Eureka.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z