Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to Corona
This post compares Napa, California to Corona, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Napa (city) | Corona (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,722 | 163,585 |
| Income (median) | $51,449 | $50,094 |
| Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $411,600 |
| White | 76% | 66% |
| Black | 0% | 5% |
| Asian | 3% | 11% |
| With Kids | 34% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 34 |
| Rentals | 43% | 35% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or Corona?
A: Napa has a much smaller population count than Corona: 79722 compared with 163585 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in Corona?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or Corona?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Napa does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Napa versus 35% for Corona.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z