Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to Belmont
This post compares Napa, California to Belmont, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Napa (city) | Belmont (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,722 | 27,110 |
| Income (median) | $51,449 | $107,466 |
| Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $1,174,200 |
| White | 76% | 62% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 3% | 27% |
| With Kids | 34% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 39 |
| Rentals | 43% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or Belmont?
A: Napa has a larger population count than Belmont: 79722 compared with 27110 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in Belmont?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or Belmont?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Napa does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Napa versus 40% for Belmont.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z