Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to Baldwin Park
This post compares Napa, California to Baldwin Park, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Napa (city) | Baldwin Park (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,722 | 76,572 |
| Income (median) | $51,449 | $31,956 |
| Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $357,500 |
| White | 76% | 34% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 3% | 18% |
| With Kids | 34% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 33 |
| Rentals | 43% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or Baldwin Park?
A: Napa has a similar population count than Baldwin Park: 79722 compared with 76572 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in Baldwin Park?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or Baldwin Park?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Baldwin Park does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Napa versus 43% for Baldwin Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z