Compare-Cities.com
Compare Napa to Bakersfield
This post compares Napa, California to Bakersfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Napa (city) | Bakersfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,722 | 372,680 |
| Income (median) | $51,449 | $44,447 |
| Home Value (median) | $536,800 | $228,400 |
| White | 76% | 68% |
| Black | 0% | 7% |
| Asian | 3% | 7% |
| With Kids | 34% | 45% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 30 |
| Rentals | 43% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Napa or Bakersfield?
A: Napa has a much smaller population count than Bakersfield: 79722 compared with 372680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Napa or in Bakersfield?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Napa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Napa or Bakersfield?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Napa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Napa does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Napa versus 43% for Bakersfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Napa may include: Fallbrook, Santa-Rosa, and Orange.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z