Compare-Cities.com
Compare Murrieta to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Murrieta, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Murrieta (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
---|---|---|
Population | 110,043 | 20,423 |
Income (median) | $58,676 | $31,494 |
Home Value (median) | $367,400 | $322,800 |
White | 64% | 36% |
Black | 6% | 1% |
Asian | 9% | 10% |
With Kids | 46% | 54% |
Age (median) | 33 | 32 |
Rentals | 33% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Murrieta or South San Jose Hills?
A: Murrieta has a much larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 110043 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Murrieta or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Murrieta.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Murrieta or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Murrieta.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Murrieta does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 33% for Murrieta versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Murrieta may include: Temecula, Antelope, and Oakley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z