Compare-Cities.com
Compare Murrieta to South San Francisco
This post compares Murrieta, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Murrieta (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 110,043 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $58,676 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $367,400 | $697,400 |
| White | 64% | 33% |
| Black | 6% | 2% |
| Asian | 9% | 39% |
| With Kids | 46% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 39 |
| Rentals | 33% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Murrieta or South San Francisco?
A: Murrieta has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 110043 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Murrieta or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Murrieta.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Murrieta or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Murrieta.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 33% for Murrieta versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Murrieta may include: Temecula, Antelope, and Oakley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z