Compare-Cities.com
Compare Murrieta to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares Murrieta, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Murrieta (city) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 110,043 | 21,680 |
| Income (median) | $58,676 | $40,695 |
| Home Value (median) | $367,400 | $374,600 |
| White | 64% | 81% |
| Black | 6% | 1% |
| Asian | 9% | 3% |
| With Kids | 46% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 38 |
| Rentals | 33% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Murrieta or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Murrieta has a much larger population count than South Lake Tahoe: 110043 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Murrieta or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Murrieta.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Murrieta or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Murrieta.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 33% for Murrieta versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Murrieta may include: Temecula, Antelope, and Oakley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z