Compare-Cities.com
Compare Murrieta to Foothill Farms
This post compares Murrieta, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Murrieta (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 110,043 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $58,676 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $367,400 | $201,200 |
| White | 64% | 67% |
| Black | 6% | 9% |
| Asian | 9% | 5% |
| With Kids | 46% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 33 |
| Rentals | 33% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Murrieta or Foothill Farms?
A: Murrieta has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 110043 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Murrieta or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Murrieta.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Murrieta or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Murrieta.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 33% for Murrieta versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Murrieta may include: Temecula, Antelope, and Oakley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z