Compare-Cities.com
Compare Murrieta to Beverly Hills
This post compares Murrieta, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Murrieta (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 110,043 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $58,676 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $367,400 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 64% | 82% |
| Black | 6% | 1% |
| Asian | 9% | 9% |
| With Kids | 46% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 43 |
| Rentals | 33% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Murrieta or Beverly Hills?
A: Murrieta has a larger population count than Beverly Hills: 110043 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Murrieta or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Murrieta.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Murrieta or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Murrieta.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 33% for Murrieta versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Murrieta may include: Temecula, Antelope, and Oakley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z