Compare-Cities.com
Compare Moorpark to South Pasadena
This post compares Moorpark, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Moorpark (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 36,060 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $63,558 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $592,500 | $928,500 |
| White | 78% | 54% |
| Black | 1% | 3% |
| Asian | 7% | 29% |
| With Kids | 38% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 40 |
| Rentals | 25% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Moorpark or South Pasadena?
A: Moorpark has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 36060 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Moorpark or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Moorpark.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Moorpark or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Moorpark.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 25% for Moorpark versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Moorpark may include: Rancho-Santa-Margarita, Poway, and Windsor.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z