Compare-Cities.com
Compare Mead Valley to South San Francisco
This post compares Mead Valley, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Mead Valley (CDP) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,402 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $35,410 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $252,200 | $697,400 |
| White | 38% | 33% |
| Black | 9% | 2% |
| Asian | 0% | 39% |
| With Kids | 55% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 33% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Mead Valley or South San Francisco?
A: Mead Valley has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 20402 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Mead Valley or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Mead Valley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Mead Valley or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Mead Valley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 33% for Mead Valley versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Mead Valley may include: Fontana, Palmdale, and Bay-Point.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z