Compare-Cities.com
Compare Madera to South Pasadena
This post compares Madera, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Madera (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 64,058 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $34,672 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $180,400 | $928,500 |
| White | 72% | 54% |
| Black | 3% | 3% |
| Asian | 1% | 29% |
| With Kids | 54% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 28 | 40 |
| Rentals | 54% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Madera or South Pasadena?
A: Madera has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 64058 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Madera or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Madera.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Madera or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Madera.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for Madera versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Madera may include: Dinuba, Santa-Maria, and Tulare.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z