Compare-Cities.com
Compare Madera to Beverly Hills
This post compares Madera, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Madera (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 64,058 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $34,672 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $180,400 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 72% | 82% |
| Black | 3% | 1% |
| Asian | 1% | 9% |
| With Kids | 54% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 28 | 43 |
| Rentals | 54% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Madera or Beverly Hills?
A: Madera has a larger population count than Beverly Hills: 64058 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Madera or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Madera.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Madera or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Madera.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for Madera versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Madera may include: Dinuba, Santa-Maria, and Tulare.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z