Compare-Cities.com
Compare Madera to Altadena
This post compares Madera, California to Altadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Madera (city) | Altadena (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 64,058 | 45,236 |
| Income (median) | $34,672 | $64,923 |
| Home Value (median) | $180,400 | $649,800 |
| White | 72% | 53% |
| Black | 3% | 22% |
| Asian | 1% | 6% |
| With Kids | 54% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 28 | 43 |
| Rentals | 54% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Madera or Altadena?
A: Madera has a larger population count than Altadena: 64058 compared with 45236 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Madera or in Altadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Madera.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Madera or Altadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Madera.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Madera does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Madera versus 29% for Altadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Madera may include: Dinuba, Santa-Maria, and Tulare.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z