Compare-Cities.com
Compare Los Banos to South San Francisco
This post compares Los Banos, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Los Banos (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 37,559 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $41,562 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $226,700 | $697,400 |
| White | 65% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 2% | 39% |
| With Kids | 49% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 39 |
| Rentals | 45% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Los Banos or South San Francisco?
A: Los Banos has a smaller population count than South San Francisco: 37559 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Los Banos or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Los Banos.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Los Banos or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Los Banos.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Los Banos does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Los Banos versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Los Banos may include: Atwater, Ceres, and Porterville.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z