Compare-Cities.com
Compare Los Banos to South Pasadena
This post compares Los Banos, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Los Banos (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 37,559 | 25,974 |
Income (median) | $41,562 | $74,034 |
Home Value (median) | $226,700 | $928,500 |
White | 65% | 54% |
Black | 1% | 3% |
Asian | 2% | 29% |
With Kids | 49% | 34% |
Age (median) | 30 | 40 |
Rentals | 45% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Los Banos or South Pasadena?
A: Los Banos has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 37559 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Los Banos or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Los Banos.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Los Banos or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Los Banos.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Los Banos versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Los Banos may include: Atwater, Ceres, and Porterville.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z