Compare-Cities.com
Compare Los Banos to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares Los Banos, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Los Banos (city) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 37,559 | 21,680 |
Income (median) | $41,562 | $40,695 |
Home Value (median) | $226,700 | $374,600 |
White | 65% | 81% |
Black | 1% | 1% |
Asian | 2% | 3% |
With Kids | 49% | 23% |
Age (median) | 30 | 38 |
Rentals | 45% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Los Banos or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Los Banos has a larger population count than South Lake Tahoe: 37559 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Los Banos or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Los Banos.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Los Banos or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Los Banos.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Los Banos versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Los Banos may include: Atwater, Ceres, and Porterville.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z