Compare-Cities.com
Compare Los Banos to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Los Banos, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Los Banos (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 37,559 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $41,562 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $226,700 | $444,200 |
| White | 65% | 62% |
| Black | 1% | 9% |
| Asian | 2% | 13% |
| With Kids | 49% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 35 |
| Rentals | 45% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Los Banos or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Los Banos has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 37559 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Los Banos or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Los Banos.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Los Banos or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Los Banos.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Los Banos does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Los Banos versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Los Banos may include: Atwater, Ceres, and Porterville.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z