Compare-Cities.com
Compare Los Angeles to San Bruno
This post compares Los Angeles, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Los Angeles (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,949,776 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $40,932 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $549,800 | $754,700 |
| White | 52% | 49% |
| Black | 8% | 1% |
| Asian | 11% | 28% |
| With Kids | 30% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 39 |
| Rentals | 63% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Los Angeles or San Bruno?
A: Los Angeles has a much larger population count than San Bruno: 3949776 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Los Angeles or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Los Angeles.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Los Angeles or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Los Angeles.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Los Angeles does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 63% for Los Angeles versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Los Angeles may include: San-Diego, San-Jose, and San-Francisco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z