Compare-Cities.com
Compare Los Angeles to Pasadena
This post compares Los Angeles, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Los Angeles (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,949,776 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $40,932 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $549,800 | $689,700 |
| White | 52% | 53% |
| Black | 8% | 10% |
| Asian | 11% | 16% |
| With Kids | 30% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 37 |
| Rentals | 63% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Los Angeles or Pasadena?
A: Los Angeles has a much larger population count than Pasadena: 3949776 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Los Angeles or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Los Angeles.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Los Angeles or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Los Angeles.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Los Angeles does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 63% for Los Angeles versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Los Angeles may include: San-Diego, San-Jose, and San-Francisco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z