Compare-Cities.com
Compare Los Angeles to Lincoln
This post compares Los Angeles, California to Lincoln, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Los Angeles (city) | Lincoln (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,949,776 | 46,404 |
| Income (median) | $40,932 | $59,287 |
| Home Value (median) | $549,800 | $389,900 |
| White | 52% | 81% |
| Black | 8% | 1% |
| Asian | 11% | 6% |
| With Kids | 30% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 43 |
| Rentals | 63% | 21% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Los Angeles or Lincoln?
A: Los Angeles has a much larger population count than Lincoln: 3949776 compared with 46404 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Los Angeles or in Lincoln?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Los Angeles.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Los Angeles or Lincoln?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Los Angeles.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Los Angeles does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 63% for Los Angeles versus 21% for Lincoln.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Los Angeles may include: San-Diego, San-Jose, and San-Francisco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z