Compare-Cities.com
Compare Los Angeles to Eureka
This post compares Los Angeles, California to Eureka, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Los Angeles (city) | Eureka (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,949,776 | 27,024 |
| Income (median) | $40,932 | $33,280 |
| Home Value (median) | $549,800 | $249,300 |
| White | 52% | 75% |
| Black | 8% | 2% |
| Asian | 11% | 7% |
| With Kids | 30% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 37 |
| Rentals | 63% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Los Angeles or Eureka?
A: Los Angeles has a much larger population count than Eureka: 3949776 compared with 27024 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Los Angeles or in Eureka?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Los Angeles.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Los Angeles or Eureka?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Los Angeles.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Los Angeles does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 63% for Los Angeles versus 54% for Eureka.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Los Angeles may include: San-Diego, San-Jose, and San-Francisco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z