Compare-Cities.com
Compare Los Angeles to Chino Hills
This post compares Los Angeles, California to Chino Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Los Angeles (city) | Chino Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,949,776 | 78,025 |
| Income (median) | $40,932 | $66,607 |
| Home Value (median) | $549,800 | $567,200 |
| White | 52% | 46% |
| Black | 8% | 4% |
| Asian | 11% | 33% |
| With Kids | 30% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 38 |
| Rentals | 63% | 23% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Los Angeles or Chino Hills?
A: Los Angeles has a much larger population count than Chino Hills: 3949776 compared with 78025 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Los Angeles or in Chino Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Los Angeles.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Los Angeles or Chino Hills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Los Angeles.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Los Angeles does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 63% for Los Angeles versus 23% for Chino Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Los Angeles may include: San-Diego, San-Jose, and San-Francisco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z