Compare-Cities.com
Compare Los Angeles to Ashland
This post compares Los Angeles, California to Ashland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Los Angeles (city) | Ashland (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,949,776 | 24,477 |
| Income (median) | $40,932 | $40,407 |
| Home Value (median) | $549,800 | $396,400 |
| White | 52% | 44% |
| Black | 8% | 17% |
| Asian | 11% | 20% |
| With Kids | 30% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 32 |
| Rentals | 63% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Los Angeles or Ashland?
A: Los Angeles has a much larger population count than Ashland: 3949776 compared with 24477 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Los Angeles or in Ashland?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Los Angeles.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Los Angeles or Ashland?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Los Angeles.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 63% for Los Angeles versus 68% for Ashland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Los Angeles may include: San-Diego, San-Jose, and San-Francisco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z