Compare-Cities.com
Compare Long Beach to South San Francisco
This post compares Long Beach, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Long Beach (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 470,489 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $46,054 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $476,400 | $697,400 |
| White | 52% | 33% |
| Black | 12% | 2% |
| Asian | 13% | 39% |
| With Kids | 32% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 39 |
| Rentals | 60% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Long Beach or South San Francisco?
A: Long Beach has a much larger population count than South San Francisco: 470489 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Long Beach or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Long Beach.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Long Beach or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Long Beach.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Long Beach does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 60% for Long Beach versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Long Beach may include: Sacramento, Fresno, and Stockton.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z