Compare-Cities.com
Compare Long Beach to South Pasadena
This post compares Long Beach, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Long Beach (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 470,489 | 25,974 |
Income (median) | $46,054 | $74,034 |
Home Value (median) | $476,400 | $928,500 |
White | 52% | 54% |
Black | 12% | 3% |
Asian | 13% | 29% |
With Kids | 32% | 34% |
Age (median) | 34 | 40 |
Rentals | 60% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Long Beach or South Pasadena?
A: Long Beach has a much larger population count than South Pasadena: 470489 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Long Beach or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Long Beach.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Long Beach or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Long Beach.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Long Beach does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 60% for Long Beach versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Long Beach may include: Sacramento, Fresno, and Stockton.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z