Compare-Cities.com
Compare Long Beach to San Fernando
This post compares Long Beach, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Long Beach (city) | San Fernando (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 470,489 | 24,581 |
| Income (median) | $46,054 | $37,371 |
| Home Value (median) | $476,400 | $370,300 |
| White | 52% | 57% |
| Black | 12% | 1% |
| Asian | 13% | 1% |
| With Kids | 32% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 33 |
| Rentals | 60% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Long Beach or San Fernando?
A: Long Beach has a much larger population count than San Fernando: 470489 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Long Beach or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Long Beach.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Long Beach or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Long Beach.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Long Beach does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 60% for Long Beach versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Long Beach may include: Sacramento, Fresno, and Stockton.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z