Compare-Cities.com
Compare Long Beach to San Bruno
This post compares Long Beach, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Long Beach (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 470,489 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $46,054 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $476,400 | $754,700 |
| White | 52% | 49% |
| Black | 12% | 1% |
| Asian | 13% | 28% |
| With Kids | 32% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 39 |
| Rentals | 60% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Long Beach or San Bruno?
A: Long Beach has a much larger population count than San Bruno: 470489 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Long Beach or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Long Beach.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Long Beach or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Long Beach.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Long Beach does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 60% for Long Beach versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Long Beach may include: Sacramento, Fresno, and Stockton.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z