Compare-Cities.com
Compare Long Beach to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Long Beach, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Long Beach (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 470,489 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $46,054 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $476,400 | $444,200 |
| White | 52% | 62% |
| Black | 12% | 9% |
| Asian | 13% | 13% |
| With Kids | 32% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 35 |
| Rentals | 60% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Long Beach or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Long Beach has a larger population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 470489 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Long Beach or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Long Beach.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Long Beach or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Long Beach.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Long Beach does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 60% for Long Beach versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Long Beach may include: Sacramento, Fresno, and Stockton.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z