Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lompoc to South San Francisco
This post compares Lompoc, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lompoc (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,762 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $36,752 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $269,100 | $697,400 |
| White | 64% | 33% |
| Black | 5% | 2% |
| Asian | 3% | 39% |
| With Kids | 42% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 57% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lompoc or South San Francisco?
A: Lompoc has a smaller population count than South San Francisco: 43762 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lompoc or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Lompoc.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lompoc or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lompoc.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lompoc does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for Lompoc versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lompoc may include: Desert-Hot-Springs, Port-Hueneme, and El-Cajon.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z