Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lompoc to South Pasadena
This post compares Lompoc, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lompoc (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,762 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $36,752 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $269,100 | $928,500 |
| White | 64% | 54% |
| Black | 5% | 3% |
| Asian | 3% | 29% |
| With Kids | 42% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 40 |
| Rentals | 57% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lompoc or South Pasadena?
A: Lompoc has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 43762 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lompoc or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Lompoc.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lompoc or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lompoc.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lompoc does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 57% for Lompoc versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lompoc may include: Desert-Hot-Springs, Port-Hueneme, and El-Cajon.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z