Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lompoc to San Bruno
This post compares Lompoc, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lompoc (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,762 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $36,752 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $269,100 | $754,700 |
| White | 64% | 49% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 3% | 28% |
| With Kids | 42% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 57% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lompoc or San Bruno?
A: Lompoc has a similar population count than San Bruno: 43762 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lompoc or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Lompoc.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lompoc or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lompoc.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lompoc does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for Lompoc versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lompoc may include: Desert-Hot-Springs, Port-Hueneme, and El-Cajon.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z