Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lomita to South San Francisco
This post compares Lomita, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lomita (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,707 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $51,315 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $561,500 | $697,400 |
| White | 59% | 33% |
| Black | 4% | 2% |
| Asian | 16% | 39% |
| With Kids | 28% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 39 |
| Rentals | 54% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lomita or South San Francisco?
A: Lomita has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 20707 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lomita or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Lomita.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lomita or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Lomita.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lomita does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Lomita versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lomita may include: Monrovia, Burbank, and Upland.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z