Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lomita to Foothill Farms
This post compares Lomita, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lomita (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,707 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $51,315 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $561,500 | $201,200 |
| White | 59% | 67% |
| Black | 4% | 9% |
| Asian | 16% | 5% |
| With Kids | 28% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 33 |
| Rentals | 54% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lomita or Foothill Farms?
A: Lomita has a smaller population count than Foothill Farms: 20707 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lomita or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Lomita.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lomita or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Lomita.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lomita does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for Lomita versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lomita may include: Monrovia, Burbank, and Upland.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z