Compare-Cities.com
Compare Loma Linda to South Pasadena
This post compares Loma Linda, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Loma Linda (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,961 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $50,460 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $333,200 | $928,500 |
| White | 54% | 54% |
| Black | 12% | 3% |
| Asian | 25% | 29% |
| With Kids | 29% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 40 |
| Rentals | 64% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Loma Linda or South Pasadena?
A: Loma Linda has a similar population count than South Pasadena: 23961 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Loma Linda or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Loma Linda.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Loma Linda or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Loma Linda.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Loma Linda does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 64% for Loma Linda versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Loma Linda may include: Marina, San-Pablo, and Arden-Arcade.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z