Compare-Cities.com
Compare Livermore to South Pasadena
This post compares Livermore, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Livermore (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 88,232 | 25,974 |
Income (median) | $75,750 | $74,034 |
Home Value (median) | $643,200 | $928,500 |
White | 78% | 54% |
Black | 1% | 3% |
Asian | 10% | 29% |
With Kids | 36% | 34% |
Age (median) | 39 | 40 |
Rentals | 28% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Livermore or South Pasadena?
A: Livermore has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 88232 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Livermore or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Livermore.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Livermore or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Livermore.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 28% for Livermore versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Livermore may include: Rancho-Santa-Margarita, Morgan-Hill, and Moorpark.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z